https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199111 In a cheque dishonour prosecution, the Bombay High Court note addresses quashing under s. 482 Cr.P.C., the scope of enquiry under s. 202 Cr.P.C. where the accused resides outside jurisdiction, and territorial jurisdiction in s. 138 matters. It records that the Magistrate issued process on the complaint and supporting documents, that the court treated the s. 202 enquiry requirement as directory in light of cited precedent, and that jurisdiction was upheld because material links, including execution of the agreement, disbursement of funds, notice, and non-payment, were connected with Mumbai. The application to quash was rejected, and the trial court was asked not to rely on observations about execution of the agreement. en-us Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:53:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199111 In a cheque dishonour prosecution, the Bombay High Court note addresses quashing under s. 482 Cr.P.C., the scope of enquiry under s. 202 Cr.P.C. where the accused resides outside jurisdiction, and territorial jurisdiction in s. 138 matters. It records that the Magistrate issued process on the complaint and supporting documents, that the court treated the s. 202 enquiry requirement as directory in light of cited precedent, and that jurisdiction was upheld because material links, including execution of the agreement, disbursement of funds, notice, and non-payment, were connected with Mumbai. The application to quash was rejected, and the trial court was asked not to rely on observations about execution of the agreement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199111