https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199096 Time was material to performance because the agreement required the sale transaction to be completed within a stipulated period. The petitioner failed to supply the final draft and did not establish financial capacity to pay the agreed cash consideration, so the evidence did not show continuous readiness and willingness to perform. The respondent, by contrast, had consistently indicated willingness to execute the sale deed. On that basis, the petitioner was found not ready and willing to perform his part of the contract and therefore not entitled to specific performance. en-us Tue, 30 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Feb 2018 10:19:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199096 Time was material to performance because the agreement required the sale transaction to be completed within a stipulated period. The petitioner failed to supply the final draft and did not establish financial capacity to pay the agreed cash consideration, so the evidence did not show continuous readiness and willingness to perform. The respondent, by contrast, had consistently indicated willingness to execute the sale deed. On that basis, the petitioner was found not ready and willing to perform his part of the contract and therefore not entitled to specific performance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199096