https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355874 The Supreme Court reinstated the Trial Judge's decision to dismiss the suit for specific performance, emphasizing the plaintiff's lack of readiness and willingness due to financial incapacity. The vague clause concerning the "no objection certificate" weakened the plaintiff's argument, leading to the High Court's judgment being set aside and the Trial Judge's decision being upheld. The plaintiff's failure to demonstrate financial capacity and continuous readiness and willingness throughout the contract period resulted in the appeal being allowed in favor of the defendants. en-us Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Aug 2022 15:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355874 The Supreme Court reinstated the Trial Judge's decision to dismiss the suit for specific performance, emphasizing the plaintiff's lack of readiness and willingness due to financial incapacity. The vague clause concerning the "no objection certificate" weakened the plaintiff's argument, leading to the High Court's judgment being set aside and the Trial Judge's decision being upheld. The plaintiff's failure to demonstrate financial capacity and continuous readiness and willingness throughout the contract period resulted in the appeal being allowed in favor of the defendants. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355874