https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355870 The HC declined to exercise jurisdiction under Art. 226, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy under Sec. 246A of the Income Tax Act. The Court directed the CIT(A) to consider the petitioner's appeal if filed within two weeks, assuring no coercive action until rectification applications were resolved. The writ petition was disposed of, highlighting the appellate process's adequacy for addressing jurisdictional errors. en-us Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Dec 2024 12:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355870 The HC declined to exercise jurisdiction under Art. 226, emphasizing the availability of an alternative remedy under Sec. 246A of the Income Tax Act. The Court directed the CIT(A) to consider the petitioner's appeal if filed within two weeks, assuring no coercive action until rectification applications were resolved. The writ petition was disposed of, highlighting the appellate process's adequacy for addressing jurisdictional errors. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355870