<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1290 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355869</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Petition challenging orders under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme due to lack of pending disputes and outstanding arrears. The Petitioner&#039;s request for refund of voluntarily deposited amount was granted, with the Revenue directed to refund the amount within six months. However, the Court rejected the claim for interest on the deposited amount, emphasizing the need for proper documentation and adherence to legal procedures in tax dispute resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 06:06:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1290 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355869</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Petition challenging orders under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme due to lack of pending disputes and outstanding arrears. The Petitioner&#039;s request for refund of voluntarily deposited amount was granted, with the Revenue directed to refund the amount within six months. However, the Court rejected the claim for interest on the deposited amount, emphasizing the need for proper documentation and adherence to legal procedures in tax dispute resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>