<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1287 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355866</link>
    <description>The High Court found in favor of the assessee in Tax Appeals challenging penalties under section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that substantial compliance with the conditions under section 132(4) suffices even if the manner of income derivation is not specified, following precedent. It emphasized the need for the authorized officer to explain provisions fully during statement recording, recognizing practical limitations on precise details. The Court agreed with the Tribunal and Allahabad High Court that substantial compliance, with income declaration and tax payment, meets section 132(4) requirements. As a result, the Tax Appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 06:06:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1287 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355866</link>
      <description>The High Court found in favor of the assessee in Tax Appeals challenging penalties under section 271AAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that substantial compliance with the conditions under section 132(4) suffices even if the manner of income derivation is not specified, following precedent. It emphasized the need for the authorized officer to explain provisions fully during statement recording, recognizing practical limitations on precise details. The Court agreed with the Tribunal and Allahabad High Court that substantial compliance, with income declaration and tax payment, meets section 132(4) requirements. As a result, the Tax Appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>