<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1262 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355841</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee-appellant, setting aside the penalty under Section 76 and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment emphasized the importance of maintaining separate accounts for taxable and exempted services as per Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, highlighting the distinction between service tax liabilities and compliance with the rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1262 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355841</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee-appellant, setting aside the penalty under Section 76 and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The judgment emphasized the importance of maintaining separate accounts for taxable and exempted services as per Rule 6(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, highlighting the distinction between service tax liabilities and compliance with the rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>