https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355832 Services performed in India for customers of a foreign principal, where the provider acted on behalf of that foreign principal, were treated as export of taxable service for the relevant period. Applying its earlier ruling, CESTAT Ahmedabad held that such activity fell within the export category and was not liable to service tax. On that basis, the refund claim was maintainable and admissible, and the Revenue's appeal failed. en-us Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Feb 2018 06:04:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355832 Services performed in India for customers of a foreign principal, where the provider acted on behalf of that foreign principal, were treated as export of taxable service for the relevant period. Applying its earlier ruling, CESTAT Ahmedabad held that such activity fell within the export category and was not liable to service tax. On that basis, the refund claim was maintainable and admissible, and the Revenue's appeal failed. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 22 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355832