https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355830 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a Central Excise manufacturer of auto parts, in a case concerning service tax liability on GTA services. The appellant was found eligible for abatement under Notification No. 32/2004, based on declarations from transporters, despite the Department's contention that the exemption was not applicable. The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax and penalties, highlighting inconsistencies in the revision order passed by the CCE and emphasizing the importance of adhering to CBEC clarifications and circulars for availing abatement in service tax liability for GTA services. en-us Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2018 15:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355830 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a Central Excise manufacturer of auto parts, in a case concerning service tax liability on GTA services. The appellant was found eligible for abatement under Notification No. 32/2004, based on declarations from transporters, despite the Department's contention that the exemption was not applicable. The Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax and penalties, highlighting inconsistencies in the revision order passed by the CCE and emphasizing the importance of adhering to CBEC clarifications and circulars for availing abatement in service tax liability for GTA services. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 15 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355830