https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355829 The case involved issues of demand of service tax, recovery of ineligible Cenvat credit, service tax under reverse charge mechanism, non-fulfillment of obligations under Cenvat Credit Rules, and service tax on commission received from services in Jammu & Kashmir. The Settlement Commission found discrepancies in the claims made by the applicant and the department, particularly regarding Cenvat credit eligibility and record maintenance. The Commission, being an arbitration forum, referred the case back to the adjudicating authority for detailed adjudication, emphasizing that the proper officer should handle the matter following due process of law. en-us Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Feb 2018 06:04:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355829 The case involved issues of demand of service tax, recovery of ineligible Cenvat credit, service tax under reverse charge mechanism, non-fulfillment of obligations under Cenvat Credit Rules, and service tax on commission received from services in Jammu & Kashmir. The Settlement Commission found discrepancies in the claims made by the applicant and the department, particularly regarding Cenvat credit eligibility and record maintenance. The Commission, being an arbitration forum, referred the case back to the adjudicating authority for detailed adjudication, emphasizing that the proper officer should handle the matter following due process of law. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355829