https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355825 The Tribunal upheld the denial of the refund claim, citing the appellant's failure to challenge previous findings on duty payment and interest settlement during investigation. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant benefitted under Section 11A(2B) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and rejected the refund claim based on the earlier decision regarding penalty imposition and duty payment appropriation. The Tribunal found no fault in the impugned order and dismissed the appellant's appeal, affirming the rejection of the refund claim. en-us Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Feb 2018 06:03:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355825 The Tribunal upheld the denial of the refund claim, citing the appellant's failure to challenge previous findings on duty payment and interest settlement during investigation. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant benefitted under Section 11A(2B) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and rejected the refund claim based on the earlier decision regarding penalty imposition and duty payment appropriation. The Tribunal found no fault in the impugned order and dismissed the appellant's appeal, affirming the rejection of the refund claim. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355825