<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1237 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355816</link>
    <description>Disposable under pads were held not to be baby and clinical diapers because diapers are ordinarily fastened around the body to absorb waste, while these goods were designed for use on a bed or chair and were not body-fitted. They were therefore classified under the residual heading for other sanitary articles rather than the diaper heading, and the exemption linked to that competing classification was available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1237 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355816</link>
      <description>Disposable under pads were held not to be baby and clinical diapers because diapers are ordinarily fastened around the body to absorb waste, while these goods were designed for use on a bed or chair and were not body-fitted. They were therefore classified under the residual heading for other sanitary articles rather than the diaper heading, and the exemption linked to that competing classification was available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>