https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199092 Candidates who knowingly participated in a fresh selection process without timely objection were barred from challenging the procedure after failing to secure selection, as waiver and estoppel applied absent patent illegality or proven prejudice. The Court also held that the amended 2001 promotion rules governed Class IV to Class III promotion, and the written test and interview pattern adopted under that framework was not invalidated on the appellants' grounds. The Division Bench result was sustained, with only a limited equitable direction allowing provisional continuance in service pending the next selection process. en-us Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Feb 2018 05:49:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199092 Candidates who knowingly participated in a fresh selection process without timely objection were barred from challenging the procedure after failing to secure selection, as waiver and estoppel applied absent patent illegality or proven prejudice. The Court also held that the amended 2001 promotion rules governed Class IV to Class III promotion, and the written test and interview pattern adopted under that framework was not invalidated on the appellants' grounds. The Division Bench result was sustained, with only a limited equitable direction allowing provisional continuance in service pending the next selection process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199092