https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199080 The SC set aside the HC's judgment, ruling that the respondents did not possess a legal right to appointment after participating in the selection process. The SC found the HC's directive to fill SC/ST reserved vacancies with general candidates and to lower the cut-off marks erroneous. The SC emphasized that setting cut-off marks is the prerogative of the employer unless proven arbitrary. The appeal was allowed, and no costs were imposed. en-us Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199080 The SC set aside the HC's judgment, ruling that the respondents did not possess a legal right to appointment after participating in the selection process. The SC found the HC's directive to fill SC/ST reserved vacancies with general candidates and to lower the cut-off marks erroneous. The SC emphasized that setting cut-off marks is the prerogative of the employer unless proven arbitrary. The appeal was allowed, and no costs were imposed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199080