https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11949 Judicial review of a Chapter XX-C pre-emptive purchase order is limited to jurisdictional error, perversity, irrelevant considerations, or breach of natural justice, and the Court will not reappreciate valuation. Comparable sale instances may be used to determine fair market value with appropriate adjustments for location, time gap, size, and other distinctions. The authority had considered the petitioner's relied-upon instance, explained why it was not comparable, and its valuation finding was not shown to be perverse. The complaint of non-supply of the valuation report also failed because it was not raised before the authority, the notice disclosed the valuation basis, and no denial of a fair opportunity was established. en-us Fri, 29 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11949 Judicial review of a Chapter XX-C pre-emptive purchase order is limited to jurisdictional error, perversity, irrelevant considerations, or breach of natural justice, and the Court will not reappreciate valuation. Comparable sale instances may be used to determine fair market value with appropriate adjustments for location, time gap, size, and other distinctions. The authority had considered the petitioner's relied-upon instance, explained why it was not comparable, and its valuation finding was not shown to be perverse. The complaint of non-supply of the valuation report also failed because it was not raised before the authority, the notice disclosed the valuation basis, and no denial of a fair opportunity was established. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 29 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11949