https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199059 Under the amended Order 37 Rule 3(5) CPC, leave to defend a summary suit may be made conditional by requiring deposit of the admitted amount, reflecting the distinction between disputed and admitted claims. A defendant may defend the disputed portion if a triable issue exists, but the admitted sum can be treated as a condition precedent to leave. Revisional interference is confined to jurisdictional error, illegality in exercise of jurisdiction, or material irregularity; where the court below is competent and no such defect is shown, revision is not warranted. en-us Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Dec 2023 17:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199059 Under the amended Order 37 Rule 3(5) CPC, leave to defend a summary suit may be made conditional by requiring deposit of the admitted amount, reflecting the distinction between disputed and admitted claims. A defendant may defend the disputed portion if a triable issue exists, but the admitted sum can be treated as a condition precedent to leave. Revisional interference is confined to jurisdictional error, illegality in exercise of jurisdiction, or material irregularity; where the court below is competent and no such defect is shown, revision is not warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199059