<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1200 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355779</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petition, directing authorities to act per the Norms Committee decision and grant the petitioner&#039;s request. The Court emphasized that forcing another appeal would be futile, given the undisputed factual position. The decision favored the petitioners, with no costs imposed. The impugned orders did not survive legal scrutiny, and the DGFT was instructed to comply with the Norms Committee&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1200 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355779</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petition, directing authorities to act per the Norms Committee decision and grant the petitioner&#039;s request. The Court emphasized that forcing another appeal would be futile, given the undisputed factual position. The decision favored the petitioners, with no costs imposed. The impugned orders did not survive legal scrutiny, and the DGFT was instructed to comply with the Norms Committee&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>