https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355767 The court dismissed the petitioner's arguments for bypassing the appeal remedy, stating that financial constraints do not justify avoiding the process. The court noted the significance of legal questions raised in the Mumbai Tribunal decision and advised the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned order to present the previous Tribunal decision to the Commissioner. The writ petition was deemed not maintainable, allowing the petitioner to file an appeal before the Tribunal. No costs were awarded, and the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition was dismissed. en-us Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Feb 2018 08:37:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355767 The court dismissed the petitioner's arguments for bypassing the appeal remedy, stating that financial constraints do not justify avoiding the process. The court noted the significance of legal questions raised in the Mumbai Tribunal decision and advised the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned order to present the previous Tribunal decision to the Commissioner. The writ petition was deemed not maintainable, allowing the petitioner to file an appeal before the Tribunal. No costs were awarded, and the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355767