<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1187 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355766</link>
    <description>Denial of service tax credit was stated to be unsustainable where the adjudication order went beyond the original show cause notice, which was limited to non-filing of the prescribed return, and introduced broader objections without detailed reasoning. The text emphasises that credit disallowance must rest on specific findings, proper verification of the documents produced, and a reasoned examination of whether the services were connected with the taxable business activity. A summary, non-speaking rejection of claims, particularly in a second round of litigation, cannot stand when the disputed services appear prima facie linked to the output service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 08:37:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1187 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355766</link>
      <description>Denial of service tax credit was stated to be unsustainable where the adjudication order went beyond the original show cause notice, which was limited to non-filing of the prescribed return, and introduced broader objections without detailed reasoning. The text emphasises that credit disallowance must rest on specific findings, proper verification of the documents produced, and a reasoned examination of whether the services were connected with the taxable business activity. A summary, non-speaking rejection of claims, particularly in a second round of litigation, cannot stand when the disputed services appear prima facie linked to the output service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>