<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1185 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355764</link>
    <description>Refund of unutilized CENVAT credit under Notification No. 5/2006-CE (NT) read with Rule 5 was held admissible where export proceeds were received in Indian rupees through a foreign banking channel. The Tribunal treated remittance routed through the nostros account mechanism and traceable to overseas foreign exchange realisation as satisfying the requirement of receipt in convertible foreign exchange. It followed earlier decisions that a formal two-step conversion is unnecessary if the substance of the transaction shows export proceeds received through the prescribed banking route. The denial of refund on the ground of non-receipt of convertible foreign exchange was unsustainable, and the claims were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 08:37:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1185 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355764</link>
      <description>Refund of unutilized CENVAT credit under Notification No. 5/2006-CE (NT) read with Rule 5 was held admissible where export proceeds were received in Indian rupees through a foreign banking channel. The Tribunal treated remittance routed through the nostros account mechanism and traceable to overseas foreign exchange realisation as satisfying the requirement of receipt in convertible foreign exchange. It followed earlier decisions that a formal two-step conversion is unnecessary if the substance of the transaction shows export proceeds received through the prescribed banking route. The denial of refund on the ground of non-receipt of convertible foreign exchange was unsustainable, and the claims were allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>