<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1179 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355758</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the adjudication order and allowing the appeal. The tribunal found that there was no provision of service of manpower by the appellant to M/s. Dhoot Compack Limited, and therefore, service tax should not be levied on the appellant for alleged manpower supply service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1179 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355758</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the adjudication order and allowing the appeal. The tribunal found that there was no provision of service of manpower by the appellant to M/s. Dhoot Compack Limited, and therefore, service tax should not be levied on the appellant for alleged manpower supply service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>