<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1173 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355752</link>
    <description>The Member (Judicial) found the Revenue authorities&#039; denial of CENVAT credit for service tax paid on outdoor canteen service, bus and car hire service, and garden service unsustainable. Relying on precedents, including the Reliance Industries case, it was held that the appellant was entitled to CENVAT credit for the services in question, even post 02/04/2011. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 08:35:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1173 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355752</link>
      <description>The Member (Judicial) found the Revenue authorities&#039; denial of CENVAT credit for service tax paid on outdoor canteen service, bus and car hire service, and garden service unsustainable. Relying on precedents, including the Reliance Industries case, it was held that the appellant was entitled to CENVAT credit for the services in question, even post 02/04/2011. The impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>