<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1535 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199048</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, relying on the judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court, held that the Service Tax paid on outward freight services until 01.04.2008 qualifies as &quot;input services&quot; under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The Tribunal emphasized that outward transport services beyond the place of removal are considered input services. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, overturning the order confirming the demand for the period from April 2005 to March 2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 08:33:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1535 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199048</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, relying on the judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court, held that the Service Tax paid on outward freight services until 01.04.2008 qualifies as &quot;input services&quot; under Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. The Tribunal emphasized that outward transport services beyond the place of removal are considered input services. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, overturning the order confirming the demand for the period from April 2005 to March 2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>