<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1424 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199051</link>
    <description>Reversal of input tax credit under the Tamil Nadu VAT Act could not be sustained where the pre-revisional notice proposed only revision of turnover for non-production of C Forms. The dealer produced the C Forms, the assessing authority accepted them and applied the concessional tax rate, but the assessment order still directed credit reversal on a ground not put to the dealer in notice. A demand that travels beyond the notice is invalid because the assessee must have an opportunity to meet the specific basis of the proposed action. The credit reversal was quashed, while the assessment was otherwise sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 08:33:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1424 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199051</link>
      <description>Reversal of input tax credit under the Tamil Nadu VAT Act could not be sustained where the pre-revisional notice proposed only revision of turnover for non-production of C Forms. The dealer produced the C Forms, the assessing authority accepted them and applied the concessional tax rate, but the assessment order still directed credit reversal on a ground not put to the dealer in notice. A demand that travels beyond the notice is invalid because the assessee must have an opportunity to meet the specific basis of the proposed action. The credit reversal was quashed, while the assessment was otherwise sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>