https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11939 The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a doctor in private practice, in a case involving the quashing of demand notices for interest under section 245D(6A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the thirty-five days for payment of tax and interest should start from the date of actual calculation and service of demand notices, not from the date of the Settlement Commission's order. As a result, the Court allowed the writ application, quashing the demand notices for interest and the order rejecting the grievance petition. en-us Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11939 The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a doctor in private practice, in a case involving the quashing of demand notices for interest under section 245D(6A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court held that the thirty-five days for payment of tax and interest should start from the date of actual calculation and service of demand notices, not from the date of the Settlement Commission's order. As a result, the Court allowed the writ application, quashing the demand notices for interest and the order rejecting the grievance petition. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11939