https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199032 Limitation was to be assessed on the date the plaint was filed, and a joint suit by transferor and transferee plaintiffs for possession was not time-barred because the transferor could rely on the personal disability exemption under Section 6 of the Limitation Act; the transferee alone could not claim that benefit, but the combined claim remained maintainable to support the common relief. A co-plaintiff who attained majority could repudiate his own claim, yet could not unilaterally withdraw from a joint suit without the consent of the other plaintiff under Order XXIII Rule 1(4) CPC, so the common possession claim could continue. en-us Fri, 15 Apr 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 17 Feb 2018 15:48:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199032 Limitation was to be assessed on the date the plaint was filed, and a joint suit by transferor and transferee plaintiffs for possession was not time-barred because the transferor could rely on the personal disability exemption under Section 6 of the Limitation Act; the transferee alone could not claim that benefit, but the combined claim remained maintainable to support the common relief. A co-plaintiff who attained majority could repudiate his own claim, yet could not unilaterally withdraw from a joint suit without the consent of the other plaintiff under Order XXIII Rule 1(4) CPC, so the common possession claim could continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Apr 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199032