<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1155 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355734</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the challenges regarding the amortization of premium on securities and the treatment of excess provisions, as they did not raise substantial legal questions. However, the Court admitted the appeal concerning the treatment of voluntary retirement payments for further consideration, directing communication of the order to the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2018 06:45:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1155 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355734</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the challenges regarding the amortization of premium on securities and the treatment of excess provisions, as they did not raise substantial legal questions. However, the Court admitted the appeal concerning the treatment of voluntary retirement payments for further consideration, directing communication of the order to the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>