<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1134 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355713</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that appellants were entitled to a refund of excess duty paid due to the air freight component exceeding 20% of the FOB value, as per Rule 10(2) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. The previous Tribunal decision supported this interpretation, leading to the allowance of the appeal and granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2018 06:43:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1134 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355713</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that appellants were entitled to a refund of excess duty paid due to the air freight component exceeding 20% of the FOB value, as per Rule 10(2) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. The previous Tribunal decision supported this interpretation, leading to the allowance of the appeal and granting consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>