<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1101 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355680</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the appeal in the case involving duty exemption under Notification No.33/2005-CE. The tribunal found in favor of the appellants, holding that the notification benefit cannot be denied based on the consignee of the goods. The appellants were granted consequential benefits as per the law, and the impugned order for recovery of duty, interest, and penalty was not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2018 06:41:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509395" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1101 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355680</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the appeal in the case involving duty exemption under Notification No.33/2005-CE. The tribunal found in favor of the appellants, holding that the notification benefit cannot be denied based on the consignee of the goods. The appellants were granted consequential benefits as per the law, and the impugned order for recovery of duty, interest, and penalty was not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>