<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1100 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355679</link>
    <description>Imported inputs cleared under a concessional regime for manufacture of excisable goods were substantially used in production, and the balance was re-exported under the governing rules. The prior decision in the assessee&#039;s own case treated such re-exported unused inputs as if they had not been imported for the relevant purpose, so no duty demand could be sustained on that basis. Applying that principle, the duty demand was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2018 06:41:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1100 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355679</link>
      <description>Imported inputs cleared under a concessional regime for manufacture of excisable goods were substantially used in production, and the balance was re-exported under the governing rules. The prior decision in the assessee&#039;s own case treated such re-exported unused inputs as if they had not been imported for the relevant purpose, so no duty demand could be sustained on that basis. Applying that principle, the duty demand was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>