<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1139 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199013</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the First Appeal Authority&#039;s decision, emphasizing the correct computation of accumulated profits for the purpose of section 2 (22) (e) and the exclusion of capital subsidy from such profits. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering commercial sense profits and adhering to legal principles in determining deemed dividends under the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2018 06:40:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1139 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199013</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the First Appeal Authority&#039;s decision, emphasizing the correct computation of accumulated profits for the purpose of section 2 (22) (e) and the exclusion of capital subsidy from such profits. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering commercial sense profits and adhering to legal principles in determining deemed dividends under the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>