https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199008 Retrospective subordinate legislation under Article 309 cannot nullify or render ineffective a concluded and binding tribunal adjudication unless a valid saving or validating provision clearly authorises that result. On that principle, the earlier tribunal direction for subject-wise promotion remained effective and was not displaced by the 1988 Recruitment (Amendment) Rules. The earlier tribunal relief was also construed as personal to Joshi, based on the judgment read as a whole, so other employees could not claim its benefit. The result was that the retrospective amendment did not defeat the prior adjudication, but the earlier relief was not extended beyond Joshi. en-us Tue, 31 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Feb 2018 18:16:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199008 Retrospective subordinate legislation under Article 309 cannot nullify or render ineffective a concluded and binding tribunal adjudication unless a valid saving or validating provision clearly authorises that result. On that principle, the earlier tribunal direction for subject-wise promotion remained effective and was not displaced by the 1988 Recruitment (Amendment) Rules. The earlier tribunal relief was also construed as personal to Joshi, based on the judgment read as a whole, so other employees could not claim its benefit. The result was that the retrospective amendment did not defeat the prior adjudication, but the earlier relief was not extended beyond Joshi. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199008