https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199003 Exclusive distribution, exhibition and exploitation rights under a film agreement were confined to the agreed territory and did not, by implication, include telecasting or satellite broadcasting rights. The court treated telecasting as a separate class of rights that must be expressly assigned, and held that trade circulars could not enlarge the contract. Because the prior suit had ended in compromise without adjudication on merits, strict res judicata did not apply and the compromise did not create estoppel on title to telecasting rights. The claim for damages and injunction accordingly failed. en-us Thu, 06 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Feb 2018 16:51:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199003 Exclusive distribution, exhibition and exploitation rights under a film agreement were confined to the agreed territory and did not, by implication, include telecasting or satellite broadcasting rights. The court treated telecasting as a separate class of rights that must be expressly assigned, and held that trade circulars could not enlarge the contract. Because the prior suit had ended in compromise without adjudication on merits, strict res judicata did not apply and the compromise did not create estoppel on title to telecasting rights. The claim for damages and injunction accordingly failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199003