<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 484 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198997</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court noted that the Special Leave Petition was dismissed on the ground of delay, with no condonation granted, making procedural laches determinative of that limb. Independently, the Court also examined the merits and found no basis for interference, so the petition was dismissed on substantive grounds as well. The overall effect was dismissal of the petition both for delay and on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:24:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 484 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198997</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court noted that the Special Leave Petition was dismissed on the ground of delay, with no condonation granted, making procedural laches determinative of that limb. Independently, the Court also examined the merits and found no basis for interference, so the petition was dismissed on substantive grounds as well. The overall effect was dismissal of the petition both for delay and on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>