https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198993 A person expressly named as a co-plaintiff in the plaint is treated as a party to the suit from its institution, even if he did not sign or verify the pleading. Section 30 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1882 applies only where a suit is brought by one person on behalf of others with joint interests who are not named as co-plaintiffs. On that construction, later procedural applications or corrections did not change the original party status, so the supposed defect did not defer commencement of the suits for limitation purposes. The suits were therefore not barred by limitation, and the decrees were set aside with the matters remitted for trial on the merits. en-us Sun, 19 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:15:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198993 A person expressly named as a co-plaintiff in the plaint is treated as a party to the suit from its institution, even if he did not sign or verify the pleading. Section 30 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1882 applies only where a suit is brought by one person on behalf of others with joint interests who are not named as co-plaintiffs. On that construction, later procedural applications or corrections did not change the original party status, so the supposed defect did not defer commencement of the suits for limitation purposes. The suits were therefore not barred by limitation, and the decrees were set aside with the matters remitted for trial on the merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sun, 19 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198993