https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198992 A written assignment deed fixing consideration cannot be varied by oral evidence where the contractual terms are reduced to writing; a mere recital of payment may be challenged, but not the bargain itself. The default clause was treated as cumulative rather than exclusive, so it did not extinguish the obligation to pay the agreed consideration. The unpaid balance remained recoverable, though interest on that sum was not justified on the facts stated. A later order granting leave to sign and verify the plaint as agent was only an irregularity and related back to the suit's institution, so limitation did not bar the action. en-us Tue, 03 Mar 1925 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:00:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198992 A written assignment deed fixing consideration cannot be varied by oral evidence where the contractual terms are reduced to writing; a mere recital of payment may be challenged, but not the bargain itself. The default clause was treated as cumulative rather than exclusive, so it did not extinguish the obligation to pay the agreed consideration. The unpaid balance remained recoverable, though interest on that sum was not justified on the facts stated. A later order granting leave to sign and verify the plaint as agent was only an irregularity and related back to the suit's institution, so limitation did not bar the action. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Mar 1925 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=198992