<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1088 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355667</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the taxpayer, directing the AO to delete the ALP adjustment on account of royalty payment and to provide full credit for taxes paid as claimed in the return of income. The Tribunal also held that the initiation of penalty proceedings was not justified. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the consistent application of the TNMM as the MAM and adherence to the decisions of higher appellate authorities in the taxpayer&#039;s own case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:17:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1088 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355667</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the taxpayer, directing the AO to delete the ALP adjustment on account of royalty payment and to provide full credit for taxes paid as claimed in the return of income. The Tribunal also held that the initiation of penalty proceedings was not justified. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the consistent application of the TNMM as the MAM and adherence to the decisions of higher appellate authorities in the taxpayer&#039;s own case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>