<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1086 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction and mechanical approval by the JCIT. Consequently, the penalty orders under Section 271(1)(c) were quashed, and the Assessing Officer was directed to delete the penalties for all relevant assessment years. The appeals of the assessees were allowed in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:16:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1086 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the reassessment proceedings invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction and mechanical approval by the JCIT. Consequently, the penalty orders under Section 271(1)(c) were quashed, and the Assessing Officer was directed to delete the penalties for all relevant assessment years. The appeals of the assessees were allowed in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>