<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1085 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355664</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by excluding capital subsidy from accumulated profits for deemed dividend purposes under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, reducing the addition. Additionally, the disallowance of interest expenses was deleted as the Tribunal found that the advances were made from sufficient interest-free funds, citing relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 21:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1085 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355664</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by excluding capital subsidy from accumulated profits for deemed dividend purposes under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, reducing the addition. Additionally, the disallowance of interest expenses was deleted as the Tribunal found that the advances were made from sufficient interest-free funds, citing relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>