<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 34 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11917</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the assessee, a firm in a consortium with another entity, was entitled to a deduction of Rs. 51,18,950 as a trading loss in the relevant assessment year. The court found that the loss occurred during the previous year, was directly related to business operations, and was not contingent. The court emphasized that subsequent events, including a C.B.I. report, did not impact the assessee&#039;s right to claim the loss. The court ruled in favor of the assessee against the Revenue, allowing the deduction for the trading loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 34 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11917</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the assessee, a firm in a consortium with another entity, was entitled to a deduction of Rs. 51,18,950 as a trading loss in the relevant assessment year. The court found that the loss occurred during the previous year, was directly related to business operations, and was not contingent. The court emphasized that subsequent events, including a C.B.I. report, did not impact the assessee&#039;s right to claim the loss. The court ruled in favor of the assessee against the Revenue, allowing the deduction for the trading loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>