https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355652 An order directing pre-deposit, once passed after considering rival submissions and the adjudication findings, could not be modified in a later miscellaneous application as if it were an appeal. The challenge raised issues meant for examination at the final hearing, and no error apparent on the face of the record was shown to justify rectification. The Tribunal therefore declined to interfere with its earlier stay order and rejected the rectification application. en-us Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:16:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355652 An order directing pre-deposit, once passed after considering rival submissions and the adjudication findings, could not be modified in a later miscellaneous application as if it were an appeal. The challenge raised issues meant for examination at the final hearing, and no error apparent on the face of the record was shown to justify rectification. The Tribunal therefore declined to interfere with its earlier stay order and rejected the rectification application. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355652