<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1060 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355639</link>
    <description>The Court interpreted interim orders under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, allowing the appellant to use a passage between properties with conditions. Civil Miscellaneous Appeals were disposed of as respondents did not press interim orders, leading to closure of connected petitions without costs. The Court directed the Tribunal to disregard interim orders in final decisions and granted parties liberty to seek prompt appeal disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:12:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1060 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355639</link>
      <description>The Court interpreted interim orders under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, allowing the appellant to use a passage between properties with conditions. Civil Miscellaneous Appeals were disposed of as respondents did not press interim orders, leading to closure of connected petitions without costs. The Court directed the Tribunal to disregard interim orders in final decisions and granted parties liberty to seek prompt appeal disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>