https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355637 The High Court directed the CBI to investigate financial misdeeds involving government largesse and quid pro quo investments. Charge sheets were filed against individuals focusing on quid pro quo arrangements. The Enforcement Directorate confirmed provisional attachment orders, challenged by appellants claiming genuine investments. Appeals against confirmation of attachment orders were filed, arguing for genuine investments and against discrimination. The burden of proof was on appellants to prove genuineness. The tribunal modified certain attachment orders but upheld others, emphasizing the need for the Special Court to decide the final outcome without influence from the judgment. en-us Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:12:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355637 The High Court directed the CBI to investigate financial misdeeds involving government largesse and quid pro quo investments. Charge sheets were filed against individuals focusing on quid pro quo arrangements. The Enforcement Directorate confirmed provisional attachment orders, challenged by appellants claiming genuine investments. Appeals against confirmation of attachment orders were filed, arguing for genuine investments and against discrimination. The burden of proof was on appellants to prove genuineness. The tribunal modified certain attachment orders but upheld others, emphasizing the need for the Special Court to decide the final outcome without influence from the judgment. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 13 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355637