<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 60 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11914</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case concerning a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act related to concealing income in the purchase of a car. The Court upheld the penalty only for the admitted concealed income of Rs. 31,000, canceling the balance penalty imposed. The judgment favored the assessee, concluding the matter with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 60 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11914</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case concerning a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act related to concealing income in the purchase of a car. The Court upheld the penalty only for the admitted concealed income of Rs. 31,000, canceling the balance penalty imposed. The judgment favored the assessee, concluding the matter with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>