<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1047 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355626</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the provision of bunk-houses for M/s. Cairns Energy India Pvt. Ltd. did not constitute a supply of tangible goods attracting Service Tax. The bunk-houses were deemed as accommodations created on-site with various components and accessories, rather than being supplied as ready-built structures. The Tribunal&#039;s decision overturned the earlier order confirming the Service Tax demand and penalties, emphasizing that the nature of the bunk-houses and the terms of the service order supported the appellant&#039;s position that no tangible goods were supplied in the arrangement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1047 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355626</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the provision of bunk-houses for M/s. Cairns Energy India Pvt. Ltd. did not constitute a supply of tangible goods attracting Service Tax. The bunk-houses were deemed as accommodations created on-site with various components and accessories, rather than being supplied as ready-built structures. The Tribunal&#039;s decision overturned the earlier order confirming the Service Tax demand and penalties, emphasizing that the nature of the bunk-houses and the terms of the service order supported the appellant&#039;s position that no tangible goods were supplied in the arrangement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>