<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1044 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355623</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Commissioner (A)&#039;s order that rejected the refund claims on certain services. The Tribunal found the rejection of CENVAT credit on Management, Maintenance, or Repair Service to be unsustainable, and clarified that a SOFTEX certificate was unnecessary for claiming refund under Business Auxiliary Services. The lower authorities were directed to quantify and sanction the eligible refund amount after document verification, rectifying the errors in the original order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:11:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1044 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355623</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Commissioner (A)&#039;s order that rejected the refund claims on certain services. The Tribunal found the rejection of CENVAT credit on Management, Maintenance, or Repair Service to be unsustainable, and clarified that a SOFTEX certificate was unnecessary for claiming refund under Business Auxiliary Services. The lower authorities were directed to quantify and sanction the eligible refund amount after document verification, rectifying the errors in the original order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>