https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355621 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, ruling that the respondent had no tax liability as a management consultant or a Real Estate Agent. The agreement between the respondent and another party was deemed a joint business venture without any consultancy element, leading to the rejection of tax liability under the management consultant category. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the respondent, acting as a real estate developer, did not operate as an agent in property transfers, resulting in the dismissal of tax liability under the Real Estate Agent category. en-us Tue, 02 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:11:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355621 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, ruling that the respondent had no tax liability as a management consultant or a Real Estate Agent. The agreement between the respondent and another party was deemed a joint business venture without any consultancy element, leading to the rejection of tax liability under the management consultant category. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the respondent, acting as a real estate developer, did not operate as an agent in property transfers, resulting in the dismissal of tax liability under the Real Estate Agent category. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 02 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355621