https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355618 The appeal was dismissed by the tribunal, upholding the demand for Service Tax on renting of immovable property services and penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The tribunal found that the amount received by the appellant was for renting of immovable property, even though there was no direct agreement with the tenant, and there was no evidence that the seller had already paid service tax on the amount. The tribunal held that the appellant could have availed credit for the service tax already paid by the seller. en-us Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:11:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355618 The appeal was dismissed by the tribunal, upholding the demand for Service Tax on renting of immovable property services and penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The tribunal found that the amount received by the appellant was for renting of immovable property, even though there was no direct agreement with the tenant, and there was no evidence that the seller had already paid service tax on the amount. The tribunal held that the appellant could have availed credit for the service tax already paid by the seller. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355618