https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355610 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore upheld the Commissioner(Appeals)'s decision to restrict a service tax demand against a consulting engineer services provider. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal, ruling that the Department was precluded from invoking the suppression clause for an extended time limit due to multiple show-cause notices already issued. The decision focused on interpreting show-cause notices, suppression clause invocation, and justifying the limited service tax demand within a normal one-year period. en-us Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:10:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355610 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore upheld the Commissioner(Appeals)'s decision to restrict a service tax demand against a consulting engineer services provider. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal, ruling that the Department was precluded from invoking the suppression clause for an extended time limit due to multiple show-cause notices already issued. The decision focused on interpreting show-cause notices, suppression clause invocation, and justifying the limited service tax demand within a normal one-year period. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355610