<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1028 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355607</link>
    <description>The judgment modified the impugned order to allow credit for Management Consultant Service and Delegate Fees. However, it partially remanded the matter concerning Renting of Immovable Property Service and Housekeeping Services for further verification, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive assessment of factual errors and proper consideration of the issues at hand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 07:10:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1028 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355607</link>
      <description>The judgment modified the impugned order to allow credit for Management Consultant Service and Delegate Fees. However, it partially remanded the matter concerning Renting of Immovable Property Service and Housekeeping Services for further verification, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive assessment of factual errors and proper consideration of the issues at hand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>